Hurricane Irma affected local economies and that cost will impact U.S. GDP, according to an analyst. Fred Katayama reports.
Video provided by Reuters
Hurricane Harvey devastated the Houston area (and economy), and while Irma could have been much worse, it still left significant destruction in Florida and the southeast. What we can say for sure is that the monetary impact of Harvey alone would have been the largest natural disaster in U.S. history, and now we must add on the monetary impact of Irma. And the hurricane season still has another month and a half to go.
These two natural disasters are likely to shave a significant amount of growth off the third quarter’s gross domestic product (I’ve seen estimates of as much as 1.5 percentage points). It is even possible that third-quarter GDP growth will be negative. Historically, exogenous events like these have often been the catalysts that actually push the economy into recession.
Here is my view of the way a near-zero third-quarter GDP growth rate is likely to play in the media come the initial growth announcement at the end of October:
The weakness in the third quarter’s real GDP growth is totally attributable to hurricanes Harvey, Irma, etc.; the underlying economy remains strong and robust, and we expect a strong bounce-back once the reconstruction from the hurricane damage begins.
When you hear or read something like this, you should defer to the underlying data, some of which is detailed below.
August’s seasonally adjusted net new job creation figure of 156,000 (per the establishment survey) disappointed to begin with, but the underlying detail showed real weakness:
- Jobs for the prior two months were adjusted downward by 41,000.
- The not-seasonally adjusted data showing a gain of 211,000 jobs was composed of 108,000 jobs that were actually counted (large and medium-sized businesses) and a 103,000 plug number from the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ “birth/death” model for small businesses (they don’t actually survey or count small business jobs).
- The Household Survey showed job losses of 74,000 (they actually count these). Because the unemployment rate (U3) is calculated from this survey, it actually rose to 4.4 percent from 4.3 percent.
- The workweek fell from 34.5 hours to 35.4 hours. Doesn’t look like much, but this is equivalent to about 400,000 jobs.
- 151,000 joined the unemployment rolls.
- The Household Survey showed a loss of 166,000 full-time positions (July showed a loss of 54,000).
- Employment in the prime working years (25-54) fell 47,000; there has been no growth in this age category from April through August.
Autos, homes and loans
The economy ordinarily performs when big-ticket items like autos and homes are selling well. Both of these indicators have clearly peaked for this business cycle, with autos in August barely breaking above 16 million units, per the seasonally adjusted annual rate. (As late as last December, it was 18 million units.) July new home sales were down 9.4 percent from June and existing home sales fell 1.3 percent over that same time frame. Bank lending has become soft, and a graph of its growth shows that it is on a significant downtrend from the third and fourth quarters of 2016. The growth of business-oriented commercial and industrial loans, including new issues of nonfinancial commercial paper, is next to nothing using the fourth quarter of 2016 as a base.
The bond market smells a rat; stocks ain’t so good either
Bond market behavior should not be ignored. At the beginning of the year, both the Fed and the Street forecast the 10-year Treasury Note yield to be significantly above 3 percent by now. Just a little over a week ago, it was flirting with 2.0 percent! The bond market clearly sees a slowing economy. And from an historical perspective, the bond market is a much better predictor of economic activity than is the stock market.
Despite the fact that the major indexes remain buoyant, most individual stocks are not doing all that well. Remember, the indexes are capitalization-weighted, meaning that the larger companies have more weight in the index. A few large-cap companies can keep the indexes high while the average stock stagnates. At this writing:
- The median Dow stock is down about 4 percent from its 52-week high; the median S&P 500 is off more than 7 percent.
- Only half of stocks are above their 50-day moving average; normally it is not a good sign when a stock pierces its 50-day moving average to the downside, much less half of the index!
To the question of future growth fueled by reconstruction from the hurricanes:
- While rebuilding occurs, the economic activity that was there before is still nonexistent.
- Reconstruction always takes longer than expected and has less of an impact than anticipated, oftentimes due to government red tape at all levels.
- There is a lack of construction workers currently holding housing back. Where are the workers going to come from to rebuild Houston and the destruction on the East Coast?
- The underlying economy is much weaker than the media admit; recent employment data, housing sales, auto sales, and bank lending bear this out.
- Q3 will show very weak economic growth, perhaps even negative.
- The bond market, usually a more reliable indicator of economic activity, is signaling a weakening economy.
- The internals of the stock market do not portend a continuation of the bull market.
- Those relying on reconstruction of hurricane damage to spur economic growth are likely to be disappointed.
Robert Barone, Ph.D. is a Georgetown-educated economist and a financial adviser at Fieldstone Financial (www.FieldstoneFinancial.com).
He is nationally known for his writings. Robert’s storied career includes his having served as a professor of finance, a community bank CEO and a director and chairman of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco. Robert is currently a director of AAA Mountain West Group, the CSAA Insurance Company, where he chairs the Finance and Investment Committee, and Allied Mineral Products. Robert oversees the investment governance program at Fieldstone Financial and heads Fieldstone Research (www.FieldstoneResearch.com).
Statistics and other information have been compiled from various sources. The facts and information are believed to be accurate and credible, but there is no guarantee as to the complete accuracy of this information.
Read or Share this story: http://www.rgj.com/story/money/business/2017/09/13/harvey-irma-push-economy-tipping-point-barone/664318001/