Close Menu
Aspire Market Guides
  • Home
  • Alternative Investments
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Economics
  • Equity Investments
  • Mutual Funds
  • Real Estate
  • Trading
What's Hot

Looking for a Non-Injurious Plan to Regulate AI | American Enterprise Institute

July 6, 2026

Mutual funds holding cash: Is high cash balance a red flag for investors? Experts explain

July 6, 2026

Stevie Aoki sued over “undisclosed endorsements” of “worthless” NFTs

July 6, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending:
  • Looking for a Non-Injurious Plan to Regulate AI | American Enterprise Institute
  • Mutual funds holding cash: Is high cash balance a red flag for investors? Experts explain
  • Stevie Aoki sued over “undisclosed endorsements” of “worthless” NFTs
  • 3 Breakout Stocks for Swing Trading This Week
  • ICICI Pru Balanced Advantage Fund leads balanced-advantage mutual funds in one-year CAGR returns; delivers… – Moneycontrol.com
  • Jump Crypto Lobbies for Digital Asset Tax Code
  • Alternative approaches to evaluation in empirical microeconomics: resources
  • Outdoor Recreation Infrastructure Scheme 2026 / 2027
  • Tyron Birkmeir’s Lurra Capital Backs LurraPay With $7 Million Investment
  • CSE launches 6th certificate training course on commodity derivatives
Monday, July 6
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Aspire Market Guides
  • Home
  • Alternative Investments
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Economics
  • Equity Investments
  • Mutual Funds
  • Real Estate
  • Trading
Aspire Market Guides
Home»Economics»Alternative approaches to evaluation in empirical microeconomics: resources
Economics

Alternative approaches to evaluation in empirical microeconomics: resources

By CharlotteJuly 6, 20264 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link


The results displayed in the paper can be reproduced with the simulated datasets and dofiles in this webpage. The following details some information to frame and facilitate the use of these resources. Please address any queries to monica_d at ifs.org.uk.

Simulations are based on the individual life-cycle model of education investment and earnings described in the paper and are made available under alternative assumptions:

  • Policy environment: (i) whether or not a subsidy to advanced education is available and (ii) whether or not the agent is informed about the existence and rules of such subsidy;
  • Selection mechanism: whether or not unobservables in the selection process and outcomes equation are related – that is, whether there exists selection on unobservable factors other than ability.

To account for all alternatives and allow for all estimation procedures, we include four STATA datasets. They all include 200 Monte-Carlo replications of samples of 2,000 observations each. In total, each dataset contains 400,000 simulated individuals, corresponding to the same number of observations. There are two main datasets, MCdta-corr.dta and MCdta-nocorr.dta, and two auxiliary datasets, MCdta-corr-noS.dta and MCdta-nocorr-noS.dta. The first versions listed are for Stata 10; the second are for Stata 8 or 9.

 MCdta-corr.dta and MCdta-nocorr.dta contain data for all three policy scenarios (depending on whether a subsidy to advanced education exists and is expected). The former represents the case of selection on unobservables other than ability and the latter represents the case of selection on observables and ability only. These two datasets are the basis for all estimation procedures. The following is a list of variables in each dataset:

Variable   Description
MCrep  

Monte-Carlo replication index

i   Individual id in Monte-Carlo sample (1 to 2000)
theta  

Individual ability (ranging between 0 and 1)

z  

 Observable in selection rule – family background (ranging between -2 and 2)

x     Observable in earnings equation – region (dummy)
y0   Potential earnings if dropping off education before advanced level
y1   Potential earnings if investing in advanced education
e_noS  

Effort in preparation for test in the absence of subsidy

e_eS  

Effort in preparation for test in the presence of expected subsidy

 e_uS    Effort in preparation for test in the presence of unexpected subsidy
s_noS  

Test score in the absence of subsidy

s_eS   Test score in the presence of expected subsidy
s_uS  

Test score in the presence of unexpected subsidy

d_noS  

Education attainment in the absence of subsidy (dummy)

d_eS  

Education attainment in the presence of expected subsidy (dummy)

d_uS  

Education attainment in the presence of unexpected subsidy (dummy)

The two potential earnings, y0 and y1, are included in the dataset. They depend on education attainment only, not on the policy scenario, and can be used together with the education variable, d_*, to construct the observed earnings in each case.

MCdta-corr-noS.dta and MCdta-nocorr-noS.dta are used together with DID to explore the use of repeated cross sections in the estimation of returns to education. They represent a time period before the occurrence of a policy intervention amounting to the introduction of a subsidy to advanced education. Therefore, only the policy scenario with no education subsidy is considered in these datasets. MCdta-corr-noS.dta represents the case of selection on unobservables other than ability and MCdta-nocorr-noS.dta represents the case of selection on observables and ability only. The following is a list of the variables in each dataset:

Variable    Description
MCrep   Monte-Carlo replication index
i   Individual id in Monte-Carlo sample (1 to 2000)
theta   Individual ability (ranging between 0 and 1)
z   Observable in selection rule – family background (ranging between -2 and 2)
x  

Observable in earnings equation – region (dummy)

e_noS  

Effort in preparation for test in the absence of subsidy

s_noS  

Test score in the absence of subsidy

d_noS  

Education attainment in the absence of subsidy (dummy)

y0  

Potential earnings if dropping off education before advanced level

y1  

Potential earnings if investing in advanced education

A set of STATA .do files implement each estimation procedure:

Two .do files were created for each method, labelled

  • name-of-the-method.do and
  • name-of-the-method-programs.do.

The former contains the main routine, which defines the dataset and variables being used, calls the estimation routines and displays the results. The latter contains two main estimation routines (together with other auxiliary routines in some cases). The first routine implements the respective estimator in a given dataset for a certain set of variables provided by the user. The second routine repeatedly applies the estimation procedure to a series of datasets to produce the Monte-Carlo results.



Source link

Related Posts

Economics

Looking for a Non-Injurious Plan to Regulate AI | American Enterprise Institute

July 6, 2026
Economics

Economics of Smaller Aberdeen-Derived Beef Cows | Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics

July 6, 2026
Economics

4 Skills An Economics Master’s Will Give You That Could Help Launch Your Global Career

July 6, 2026
Economics

The Weekly Look at the Global Economy and Market

July 6, 2026
Economics

Household Debt and Credit Report

July 6, 2026
Economics

As tech rallies and consumer shares lag, China’s stock market forms microcosm for economy

July 6, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Editors Picks

Looking for a Non-Injurious Plan to Regulate AI | American Enterprise Institute

July 6, 2026

Mutual funds holding cash: Is high cash balance a red flag for investors? Experts explain

July 6, 2026

Stevie Aoki sued over “undisclosed endorsements” of “worthless” NFTs

July 6, 2026

3 Breakout Stocks for Swing Trading This Week

July 6, 2026
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Get our latest downloads and information first. Complete the form below to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.


I consent to being contacted via telephone and/or email and I consent to my data being stored in accordance with European GDPR regulations and agree to the terms of use and privacy policy.

Featured

Oil shock prompts Commerzbank to cut 2026 gold target to $4,800/oz

June 3, 2026

Why Picking Individual Stocks May Be a Better Move Right Now Than Buying Index Funds and ETFs

June 24, 2026

Germany sees slow economic recovery as energy prices weigh

June 12, 2026
Monthly Featured

Report highlights success of new approach to highways maintenance

June 13, 2026

2002 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions VE

July 5, 2026

Side Letter: Structured sophistication

April 7, 2026
Latest Posts

Looking for a Non-Injurious Plan to Regulate AI | American Enterprise Institute

July 6, 2026

Mutual funds holding cash: Is high cash balance a red flag for investors? Experts explain

July 6, 2026

Stevie Aoki sued over “undisclosed endorsements” of “worthless” NFTs

July 6, 2026
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Get our latest downloads and information first. Complete the form below to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.


I consent to being contacted via telephone and/or email and I consent to my data being stored in accordance with European GDPR regulations and agree to the terms of use and privacy policy.

© 2026 Aspire Market Guides.
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Get our latest downloads and information first.

Complete the form below to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.


I consent to being contacted via telephone and/or email and I consent to my data being stored in accordance with European GDPR regulations and agree to the terms of use and privacy policy.