Close Menu
Aspire Market Guides
  • Home
  • Alternative Investments
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Economics
  • Equity Investments
  • Mutual Funds
  • Real Estate
  • Trading
What's Hot

Channel 4 Programming Boss Outlines “Mixed Economy” Commissioning Plan

July 30, 2026

These 4 flexicap mutual funds delivered single-digit returns in 3 years. Check details – The Economic Times

July 30, 2026

The Odyssey: IMAX Melbourne voids all third-party ticket sales

July 30, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending:
  • Channel 4 Programming Boss Outlines “Mixed Economy” Commissioning Plan
  • These 4 flexicap mutual funds delivered single-digit returns in 3 years. Check details – The Economic Times
  • The Odyssey: IMAX Melbourne voids all third-party ticket sales
  • NFTs are coming back but Blue Chip projects are on life support
  • Behavioral Economics in Education Market Design: A Forward-Looking Review
  • MPC Sales Improved at Mid-Year despite broader new home market decline in June of 5.6% YoY According to RCLCO Real Estate Consulting’s 2026 Mid-Year Master-Planned Communities Report
  • Is OIBAX a Strong Bond Fund Right Now?
  • Crypto is finally getting its rulebook. Now it’s finding its role.
  • Cryptocurrency prices show mixed movements with Bitcoin near $64,500 and Ethereum around $1,915. – Pluang
  • Global funds attract investors amid AI turbulence – AMWatch
Thursday, July 30
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Aspire Market Guides
  • Home
  • Alternative Investments
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Economics
  • Equity Investments
  • Mutual Funds
  • Real Estate
  • Trading
Aspire Market Guides
Home»Economics»Behavioral Economics in Education Market Design: A Forward-Looking Review
Economics

Behavioral Economics in Education Market Design: A Forward-Looking Review

By CharlotteJuly 30, 202613 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link


  • Abdulkadiroğlu, Atila, Yeon-Koo Che, and Yosuke Yasuda. 2011. “Resolving Conflicting Preferences in School Choice: The ‘Boston Mechanism’ Reconsidered.” A.E.R. 101 (1): 399–410.

  • Abdulkadiroğlu, Atila, Parag A. Pathak, and Alvin E. Roth. 2005. “The New York City High School Match.” A.E.R. 95 (May): 364–67.

  • Abdulkadiroğlu, Atila, Parag A. Pathak, Alvin E. Roth, and Tayfun Sönmez. 2005. “The Boston Public School Match.” A.E.R. 95 (May): 368–71.

  • ———. 2006. “Changing the Boston School Choice Mechanism.” Working Paper no. 11965, NBER, Cambridge, MA.

  • Abdulkadiroğlu, Atila, and Tayfun Sönmez. 2003. “School Choice: A Mechanism Design Approach.” A.E.R. 93:729–47.

  • Agarwal, Nikhil, and Paulo Somaini. 2018. “Demand Analysis Using Strategic Reports: An Application to a School Choice Mechanism.” Econometrica 86:391–444.

  • ———. 2020. “Revealed Preference Analysis of School Choice Models.” Ann. Rev. Econ. 12:471–501.

  • Ajayi, Kehinde. 2014. “Does School Quality Improve Student Performance? New Evidence from Ghana.” Working paper.

  • Ajayi, Kehinde, and Modibo Sidibe. 2022. “School Choice under Imperfect Information.” Working paper.

  • Ali, S. Nageeb, and Ran I. Shorrer. 2022. “The College Portfolio Problem.” Working paper.

  • Allcott, Hunt, Benjamin B. Lockwood, and Dmitry Taubinsky. 2019. “Regressive Sin Taxes, with an Application to the Optimal Soda Tax.” Q.J.E. 134:1557–626.

  • Allcott, Hunt, and Dmitry Taubinsky. 2015. “Evaluating Behaviorally Motivated Policy: Experimental Evidence from the Lightbulb Market.” A.E.R. 105:2501–38.

  • Arteaga, Felipe, Adam J. Kapor, Christopher A. Neilson, and Seth D. Zimmerman. 2022. “Smart Matching Platforms and Heterogeneous Beliefs in Centralized School Choice.” Q.J.E. 137:1791–848.

  • Artemov, Georgy. 2021. “Assignment Mechanisms: Common Preferences and Information Acquisition.” J. Econ. Theory 198:105370.

  • Artemov, Georgy, Yeon-Koo Che, and Yinghua He. 2020. “Strategic ‘Mistakes’: Implications for Market Design Research.” Working paper.

  • ———. 2023. “Stable Matching with Mistaken Agents.” J.P.E. Microeconomics 1 (2): 270–320.

  • Ashlagi, Itai, and Yannai A. Gonczarowski. 2018. “Stable Matching Mechanisms Are Not Obviously Strategy-Proof.” J. Econ. Theory 177:405–25.

  • Aygün, Orhan, and Bertan Turhan. 2017. “Large-Scale Affirmative Action in School Choice: Admissions to IITs in India.” A.E.R. 107:210–13.

  • Azevedo, Eduardo M., and Jacob D. Leshno. 2016. “A Supply and Demand Framework for Two-Sided Matching Markets.” J.P.E. 124 (5): 1235–68.

  • Bade, Sophie. 2015. “Serial Dictatorship: The Unique Optimal Allocation Rule When Information Is Endogenous.” Theoretical Econ. 10:385–410.

  • Balinski, Michel, and Tayfun Sönmez. 1999. “A Tale of Two Mechanisms: Student Placement.” J. Econ. Theory 84:73–94.

  • Basteck, Christian, and Marco Mantovani. 2018. “Cognitive Ability and Games of School Choice.” Games and Econ. Behavior 109:156–83.

  • ———. 2022. “Aiding Applicants: Leveling the Playing Field within the Immediate Acceptance Mechanism.” Rev. Econ. Design 27:187–220.

  • Becker, Gordon M., Morris H. DeGroot, and Jacob Marschak. 1964. “Measuring Utility by a Single-Response Sequential Method.” Behavioral Sci. 9:226–32.

  • Benjamin, Daniel J. 2019. “Errors in Probabilistic Reasoning and Judgment Biases.” In Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Applications and Foundations, vol. 2, edited by B. Douglas Bernheim, Stefano DellaVigna, and David Laibson, 69–186. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

  • Benjamin, Daniel J., Ori Heffetz, Miles S. Kimball, and Alex Rees-Jones. 2014. “Can Marginal Rates of Substitution Be Inferred from Happiness Data? Evidence from Residency Choices.” A.E.R. 104:3498–528.

  • Bernheim, B. Douglas, and Dmitry Taubinsky. 2018. “Behavioral Public Economics.” In Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Applications and Foundations, vol. 1, edited by B. Douglas Bernheim, Stefano DellaVigna, and David Laibson, 381–516. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

  • Bó, Inácio, and Rustamdjan Hakimov. 2020a. “Iterative versus Standard Deferred Acceptance: Experimental Evidence.” Econ J. 130:356–92.

  • ———. 2020b. “Pick-an-Object Mechanisms.” Working paper.

  • Bobba, Matteo, and Veronica Frisancho. 2022. “Self-Perceptions about Academic Achievement: Evidence from Mexico City.” J. Econometrics 231:58–73.

  • BPS (Boston Public Schools). 2005. “Recommendation to Implement a New BPS Assignment Algorithm.” Presentation to the Boston School Committee, May 11.

  • Bucher, Stefan F., and Andrew Caplin. 2021. “Inattention and Inequity in School Matching.” Working Paper no. 29586, NBER, Cambridge, MA.

  • Calsamiglia, Caterina, Guillaume Haeringer, and Flip Klijn. 2010. “Constrained School Choice: An Experimental Study.” A.E.R. 100:1860–74.

  • Cason, Timothy N., and Charles R. Plott. 2014. “Misconceptions and Game Form Recognition: Challenges to Theories of Revealed Preference and Framing.” J.P.E. 122 (6): 1235–70.

  • Chade, Hector, and Lones Smith. 2006. “Simultaneous Search.” Econometrica 74:1293–307.

  • Chandra, Amitabh, Benjamin Handel, and Joshua Schwartzstein. 2019. “Behavioral Economics and Health-Care Markets.” In Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Applications and Foundations, vol. 2, edited by B. Douglas Bernheim, Stefano DellaVigna, and David Laibson, 459–502. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

  • Chen, Li, and Juan Sebastián Pereyra. 2019. “Self-Selection in School Choice.” Games and Econ. Behavior 117:59–81.

  • Chen, Yan, Peter Cramton, John A. List, and Axel Ockenfels. 2021. “Market Design, Human Behavior, and Management.” Management Sci. 67:5317–48.

  • Chen, Yan, and YingHua He. 2021. “Information Acquisition and Provision in School Choice: An Experimental Study.” J. Econ. Theory 197:105345.

  • ———. 2022. “Information Acquisition and Provision in School Choice: A Theoretical Investigation.” Econ. Theory 74:293–327.

  • Chen, Yan, Yingzhi Liang, and Tayfun Sönmez. 2016. “School Choice under Complete Information: An Experimental Study.” J. Mechanism and Inst. Design 1:45–82.

  • Chen, Yan, and Tayfun Sönmez. 2006. “School Choice: An Experimental Study.” J. Econ. Theory 127:202–31.

  • Chetty, Raj. 2009. “Sufficient Statistics for Welfare Analysis: A Bridge between Structural and Reduced-Form Methods.” Ann. Rev. Econ. 1:451–88.

  • Chetty, Raj, Adam Looney, and Kory Kroft. 2009. “Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence.” A.E.R. 99:1145–77.

  • Ding, Tingting, and Andrew Schotter. 2017. “Matching and Chatting: An Experimental Study of the Impact of Network Communication on School-Matching Mechanisms.” Games and Econ. Behavior 103:94–115.

  • ———. 2019. “Learning and Mechanism Design: An Experimental Test of School Matching Mechanisms with Intergenerational Advice.” Econ. J. 129:2779–804.

  • Dreyfuss, Bnaya, Ofer Glicksohn, Ori Heffetz, and Assaf Romm. 2022. “Deferred Acceptance with News Utility.” Working Paper no. 30635, NBER, Cambridge, MA.

  • Dreyfuss, Bnaya, Ori Heffetz, and Matthew Rabin. 2022. “Expectations-Based Loss Aversion May Help Explain Seemingly Dominated Choices in Strategy-Proof Mechanisms.” American Econ. J. Microeconomics 14:515–55.

  • Dubins, Lester E., and David A. Freedman. 1981. “Machiavelli and the Gale-Shapley Algorithm.” American Math. Monthly 88:485–94.

  • Dur, Umut, Scott D. Kominers, Parag A. Pathak, and Tayfun Sönmez. 2018. “Reserve Design: Unintended Consequences and the Demise of Boston’s Walk Zones.” J.P.E. 126 (6): 2457–79.

  • Dynarski, Susan, C. J. Libassi, Katherine Michelmore, and Stephanie Owen. 2021. “Closing the Gap: The Effect of Reducing Complexity and Uncertainty in College Pricing on the Choices of Low-Income Students.” A.E.R. 111:1721–56.

  • Echenique, Federico, Ruy González, Alistair J. Wilson, and Leeat Yariv. 2022. “Top of the Batch: Interviews and the Match.” A.E.R.: Insights 4:223–38.

  • Enke, Benjamin. 2020. “What You See Is All There Is.” Q.J.E. 135:1363–98.

  • Enke, Benjamin, and Florian Zimmermann. 2019. “Correlation Neglect in Belief Formation.” Rev. Econ. Studies 86:313–32.

  • Fabre, Anaïs, Tomás Larroucau, Manuel Martınez, Christopher Neilson, and Ignacio Rios. 2021. “Application Mistakes and Information Frictions in College Admissions.” Working paper.

  • Fack, Gabrielle, Julien Grenet, and Yinghua He. 2019. “Beyond Truth-Telling: Preference Estimation with Centralized School Choice and College Admissions.” A.E.R. 109:1486–529.

  • Farhi, Emmanuel, and Xavier Gabaix. 2020. “Optimal Taxation with Behavioral Agents.” A.E.R 110:298–336.

  • Featherstone, Clayton R., and Muriel Niederle. 2016. “Boston versus Deferred Acceptance in an Interim Setting: An Experimental Investigation.” Games and Econ. Behavior 100:353–75.

  • Fernandes, Daniel, John G. Lynch Jr., and Richard G. Netemeyer. 2014. “Financial Literacy, Financial Education, and Downstream Financial Behaviors.” Management Sci. 60:1861–83.

  • Gabaix, Xavier, David Laibson, Guillermo Moloche, and Stephen Weinberg. 2006. “Costly Information Acquisition: Experimental Analysis of a Boundedly Rational Model.” A.E.R. 96:1043–68.

  • Gale, David, and Lloyd S. Shapley. 1962. “College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage.” American Math. Monthly 69:9–15.

  • Gilovich, Thomas, Dale Griffin, and Daniel Kahneman. 2002. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

  • Goldin, Jacob, and Daniel Reck. 2018. “Rationalizations and Mistakes: Optimal Policy with Normative Ambiguity.” AEA Papers and Proc. 108:98–102.

  • ———. 2022. “Optimal Defaults with Normative Ambiguity.” Rev. Econ. and Statis. 104:17–33.

  • Golman, Russell, David Hagmann, and George Loewenstein. 2017. “Information Avoidance.” J. Econ. Literature 55:96–135.

  • Gonczarowski, Yannai A., Ori Heffetz, and Clayton Thomas. 2022. “Strategyproofness-Exposing Mechanism Descriptions.” Working paper.

  • Grenet, Julien, YingHua He, and Dorothea Kübler. 2022. “Preference Discovery in University Admissions: The Case for Dynamic Multioffer Mechanisms.” J.P.E. 130 (6): 1427–76.

  • Gross, Betheny, Michael DeArmond, and Patrick Denice. 2015. “Common Enrollment, Parents, and School Choice: Early Evidence from Denver and New Orleans.” Report, Center Reinventing Public Educ., Seattle.

  • Guillen, Pablo, and Rustamdjan Hakimov. 2017. “Not Quite the Best Response: Truth-Telling, Strategy-Proof Matching, and the Manipulation of Others.” Experimental Econ. 20:670–86.

  • ———. 2018. “The Effectiveness of Top-Down Advice in Strategy-Proof Mechanisms: A Field Experiment.” European Econ. Rev. 101:505–11.

  • Guillen, Pablo, and Alexander Hing. 2014. “Lying through Their Teeth: Third Party Advice and Truth Telling in a Strategy Proof Mechanism.” European Econ. Rev. 70:178–85.

  • Guillen, Pablo, and Róbert F. Veszteg. 2021. “Strategy-Proofness in Experimental Matching Markets.” Experimental Econ. 24:650–68.

  • Haeringer, Guillaume, and Flip Klijn. 2009. “Constrained School Choice.” J. Econ. Theory 144:1921–47.

  • Hakimov, Rustamdjan, and Dorothea Kübler. 2021. “Experiments on Centralized School Choice and College Admissions: A Survey.” Experimental Econ. 24:434–88.

  • Harrison, Glenn, and Kevin McCabe. 1996. “Stability and Preference Distortion in Resource Matching: An Experimental Study of the Marriage Problem.” In Research in Experimental Economics, edited by Vernon Smith, 53–129. Greenwich, CT: JAI.

  • Hassidim, Avinatan, Déborah Marciano, Assaf Romm, and Ran I. Shorrer. 2017. “The Mechanism Is Truthful, Why Aren’t You?” A.E.R. 107:220–24.

  • Hassidim, Avinatan, Assaf Romm, and Ran I. Shorrer. 2017. “Redesigning the Israeli Psychology Master’s Match.” A.E.R. 107:205–9.

  • ———. 2021. “The Limits of Incentives in Economic Matching Procedures.” Management Sci. 67:951–63.

  • Idoux, Clémence. 2022. “Integrating New York City Schools: The Role of Admission Criteria and Family Preferences.” Discussion Paper no. 2022.14, Blueprint Labs, Cambridge, MA.

  • Immorlica, Nicole, Jacob Leshno, Irene Lo, and Brendan Lucier. 2020. “Information Acquisition in Matching Markets: The Role of Price Discovery.” Working paper.

  • Kagel, John, and Alvin E. Roth. 2000. “The Dynamics of Reorganization in Matching Markets: A Laboratory Experiment Motivated by a Natural Experiment.” Q.J.E. 115:201–35.

  • Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica 47:263–91.

  • Kapor, Adam J., Christopher A. Neilson, and Seth D. Zimmerman. 2020. “Heterogeneous Beliefs and School Choice Mechanisms.” A.E.R. 110:1274–315.

  • Klijn, Flip, Joana Pais, and Marc Vorsatz. 2019. “Static versus Dynamic Deferred Acceptance in School Choice: Theory and Experiment.” Games and Econ. Behavior 113:147–63.

  • Kloosterman, Andrew, and Peter Troyan. 2022. “Rankings-Dependent Preferences: A Real Goods Matching Experiment.” Working paper.

  • Koutout, Kristine, Andrew Dustan, Martin Van der Linden, and Myrna Wooders. 2021. “Mechanism Performance under Strategy Advice and Sub-optimal Play: A School Choice Experiment.” J. Behavioral and Experimental Econ. 94:101755.

  • Kőszegi, Botond. 2006. “Ego Utility, Overconfidence, and Task Choice.” J. European Econ. Assoc. 4:673–707.

  • Kőszegi, Botond, and Matthew Rabin. 2006. “A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences.” Q.J.E. 121:1133–66.

  • ———. 2007. “Reference-Dependent Risk Attitudes.” A.E.R. 97:1047–73.

  • ———. 2009. “Reference-Dependent Consumption Plans.” A.E.R. 99:909–36.

  • Larroucau, Tomás, and Ignacio Rios. 2020. “Do ‘Short-List’ Students Report Truthfully? Strategic Behavior in the Chilean College Admissions Problem.” Working paper.

  • Li, Shengwu. 2017. “Obviously Strategy-Proof Mechanisms.” A.E.R. 107:3257–87.

  • Lucas, Adrienne M., and Isaac M. Mbiti. 2012. “The Determinants and Consequences of School Choice Errors in Kenya.” A.E.R. 102:283–88.

  • Luflade, Margaux. 2018. “The Value of Information in Centralized School Choice Systems.” Working paper.

  • Mani, Anandi, Sendhil Mullainathan, Eldar Shafir, and Jiaying Zhao. 2013. “Poverty Impedes Cognitive Function.” Science 341:976–80.

  • Meisner, Vincent. 2022. “Report-Dependent Utility and Strategy-Proofness.” Management Sci. 69 (5): 2733–45.

  • Meisner, Vincent, and Jonas von Wangenheim. 2021. “School Choice and Loss Aversion.” Working Paper no. 9479, CESifo, Munich.

  • ———. 2023. “Loss Aversion in Strategy-Proof School-Choice Mechanisms.” J. Econ. Theory 207:105588.

  • Moore, Don A., and Paul J. Healy. 2008. “The Trouble with Overconfidence.” Psychological Rev. 115:502.

  • Niederle, Muriel, and Emmanuel Vespa. 2022. “Cognitive Reasoning: Failures of Contingent Thinking.” Working paper.

  • Noda, Shunya. 2022. “Strategic Experimentation with Random Serial Dictatorship.” Games and Econ. Behavior 133:115–25.

  • O’Donoghue, Ted, and Charles Sprenger. 2018. “Reference-Dependent Preferences.” In Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Applications and Foundations, vol. 1, edited by B. Douglas Bernheim, Stefano DellaVigna, and David Laibson, 1–77. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

  • Pais, Joana, and Ágnes Pintér. 2008. “School Choice and Information: An Experimental Study on Matching Mechanisms.” Games and Econ. Behavior 64:303–28.

  • Pais, Joana, Ágnes Pintér, and Róbert F. Veszteg. 2011. “College Admissions and the Role of Information: An Experimental Study.” Internat. Econ. Rev. 52:713–37.

  • Pan, Siqi. 2019. “The Instability of Matching with Overconfident Agents.” Games and Econ. Behavior 113:396–415.

  • Pathak, Parag A. 2016. “What Really Matters in Designing School Choice Mechanisms.” Paper presented at the 11th World Congress of the Econometric Society (Advances in Economics and Econometrics), Montreal, August 17–21.

  • Pathak, Parag A., Alex Rees-Jones, and Tayfun Sönmez. 2022a. “Immigration Lottery Design: Engineered and Coincidental Consequences of H-1B Reforms.” Rev. Econ. and Statis., forthcoming.

  • ———. 2022b. “Reversing Reserves.” Management Sci., forthcoming.

  • Pathak, Parag A., and Tayfun Sönmez. 2008. “Leveling the Playing Field: Sincere and Sophisticated Players in the Boston Mechanism.” A.E.R. 98 (4): 1636–52.

  • ———. 2013. “School Admissions Reform in Chicago and England: Comparing Mechanisms by their Vulnerability to Manipulation.” A.E.R. 103 (1): 80–106.

  • Peranson, Jonah. 2019. “Design and Implementation of the Genetic Counseling Admissions Match.” Paper presented at the 5th International Workshop on Matching under Preferences (Match-UP), Ascona, Switzerland, May 26–29.

  • Pycia, Marek, and Peter Troyan. Forthcoming. “A Theory of Simplicity in Games and Mechanism Design.” Econometrica.

  • Rees-Jones, Alex. 2017. “Mistaken Play in the Deferred Acceptance Algorithm: Implications for Positive Assortative Matching.” A.E.R. 107:225–29.

  • ———. 2018a. “Quantifying Loss-Averse Tax Manipulation.” Rev. Econ. Studies 85:1251–78.

  • ———. 2018b. “Suboptimal Behavior in Strategy-Proof Mechanisms: Evidence from the Residency Match.” Games and Econ. Behavior 108:317–30.

  • Rees-Jones, Alex, Ran I. Shorrer, and Chloe Tergiman. 2020. “Correlation Neglect in Student-to-School Matching.” Working Paper no. 26734, NBER, Cambridge, MA.

  • Rees-Jones, Alex, and Samuel Skowronek. 2018. “An Experimental Investigation of Preference Misrepresentation in the Residency Match.” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 115:11471–76.

  • Rees-Jones, Alex, and Dmitry Taubinsky. 2020. “Measuring ‘Schmeduling.’” Rev. Econ. Studies 87:2399–438.

  • Roth, Alvin E. 1982. “The Economics of Matching: Stability and Incentives.” Math. Operations Res. 7:617–28.

  • ———. 1984. “The Evolution of the Labor Market for Medical Interns and Residents: A Case Study in Game Theory.” J.P.E. 92 (6): 991–1016.

  • ———. 2002. “The Economist as Engineer: Game Theory, Experimentation, and Computation as Tools for Design Economics.” Econometrica 70:1341–78.

  • Roth, Alvin E., and Elliott Peranson. 1999. “The Redesign of the Matching Market for American Physicians: Some Engineering Aspects of Economic Design.” A.E.R. 89:748–80.

  • Roth, Alvin E., and Xiaolin Xing. 1994. “Jumping the Gun: Imperfections and Institutions Related to the Timing of Market Transactions.” A.E.R. 84:992–1044.

  • Shapley, Lloyd, and Herbert Scarf. 1974. “On Cores and Indivisibility.” J. Math. Econ. 1:23–28.

  • Sharot, Tali, and Cass R. Sunstein. 2020. “How People Decide What They Want to Know.” Nature Human Behaviour 4:14–19.

  • Shorrer, Ran I., and Sándor Sóvágó. 2023. “Dominated Choices under Deferred Acceptance Mechanism: The Effect of Admission Selectivity.” Working paper.

  • ———. Forthcoming. “Dominated Choices in a Strategically Simple College Admissions Environment.” J.P.E. Microeconomics.

  • Slovic, Paul. 1995. “The Construction of Preference.” American Psychologist 50:364.

  • Sönmez, Tayfun. 2023. “Minimalist Approach to Institution Redesign: A Framework for an Aspiring Market Designer.” Working paper.

  • Sönmez, Tayfun, and M. Bumin Yenmez. 2022. “Affirmative Action in India via Vertical, Horizontal, and Overlapping Reservations.” Econometrica 90:1143–76.

  • Taubinsky, Dmitry, and Alex Rees-Jones. 2018. “Attention Variation and Welfare: Theory and Evidence from a Tax Salience Experiment.” Rev. Econ. Studies 85:2462–96.

  • Thaler, Richard H., and Cass R. Sunstein. 2009. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. London: Penguin.

  • Thomas, Clayton. 2021. “Classification of Priorities Such That Deferred Acceptance Is OSP Implementable.” Paper presented at the 22nd Association for Computing Machinery Conference on Economics and Computation, Budapest, Hungary, July 13–17.

  • Troyan, Peter. 2019. “Obviously Strategy-Proof Implementation of Top Trading Cycles.” Internat. Econ. Rev. 60:1249–61.

  • Wang, Ao, Shaoda Wang, and Xiaoyang Ye. 2021. “Cognitive Distortions in Complex Decisions: Evidence from Centralized College Admission.” Working paper.



  • Source link

    Related Posts

    Economics

    Channel 4 Programming Boss Outlines “Mixed Economy” Commissioning Plan

    July 30, 2026
    Economics

    Center for Applied Economics releases July 2026 Metro Milwaukee Economic Insights Report

    July 30, 2026
    Economics

    How Amosun became Babcock’s best graduating Economics student

    July 30, 2026
    Economics

    Efficient Estimation for Staggered Rollout Designs

    July 30, 2026
    Economics

    Departmental Seminar – Nov 21st

    July 30, 2026
    Economics

    Parallel Trends and Dynamic Choices

    July 29, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Editors Picks

    Channel 4 Programming Boss Outlines “Mixed Economy” Commissioning Plan

    July 30, 2026

    These 4 flexicap mutual funds delivered single-digit returns in 3 years. Check details – The Economic Times

    July 30, 2026

    The Odyssey: IMAX Melbourne voids all third-party ticket sales

    July 30, 2026

    NFTs are coming back but Blue Chip projects are on life support

    July 30, 2026
    SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

    Get our latest downloads and information first. Complete the form below to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.


    I consent to being contacted via telephone and/or email and I consent to my data being stored in accordance with European GDPR regulations and agree to the terms of use and privacy policy.

    Featured

    Bio Protocol price outlook: $0.045 rebound possible amid extended consolidation

    April 29, 2026

    OpenAI seals $10B private equity joint venture for enterprise AI

    May 4, 2026

    NSE flags regulatory, tech, AI, derivatives concentration risks in IPO papers, ETCIO

    June 19, 2026
    Monthly Featured

    As private equity creeps into utilities, citizens face an uphill battle

    July 19, 2026

    Mubadala Capital Integrates Mubadala’s $25 Billion Credit Business

    July 7, 2026

    No ‘pure direction’ equities are taking right now, economist says

    June 11, 2026
    Latest Posts

    Channel 4 Programming Boss Outlines “Mixed Economy” Commissioning Plan

    July 30, 2026

    These 4 flexicap mutual funds delivered single-digit returns in 3 years. Check details – The Economic Times

    July 30, 2026

    The Odyssey: IMAX Melbourne voids all third-party ticket sales

    July 30, 2026
    SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

    Get our latest downloads and information first. Complete the form below to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.


    I consent to being contacted via telephone and/or email and I consent to my data being stored in accordance with European GDPR regulations and agree to the terms of use and privacy policy.

    © 2026 Aspire Market Guides.
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

    Get our latest downloads and information first.

    Complete the form below to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.


    I consent to being contacted via telephone and/or email and I consent to my data being stored in accordance with European GDPR regulations and agree to the terms of use and privacy policy.