Goldman Sachs and BofA Are Making a Major Stablecoin Bet. Is It Worth Watching?

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE:GS) and Bank of America Corporation (NYSE:BAC) are among 21 financial institutions planning to launch a U.S. dollar-backed stablecoin in the first half of 2027. The banks are expected to create a joint company to issue the stablecoin, with plans to eventually expand into other G7 currencies, including the euro. The initiative reflects growing interest among traditional banks in blockchain-based payments and could help them compete with established stablecoin issuers.

The opportunity, however, is still developing. Reuters noted that existing bank-issued stablecoins have seen limited adoption, while established players such as Tether continue to dominate the market. That means the project could take years to become financially meaningful for participating banks.

Photo by Akshay Sadarangani on Unsplash

Goldman Sachs- Bull & Bear Case

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE:GS) could benefit from getting an early foothold in the rapidly developing digital-assets and blockchain ecosystem. The bank’s institutional client base and expertise in trading and capital markets could provide several opportunities if stablecoins become more widely used for payments, settlement, and other financial transactions. Rather than simply issuing a digital token, Goldman could potentially build additional financial services around the stablecoin as adoption grows.

The joint structure is also a positive because Goldman will not have to bear the entire cost of developing the infrastructure on its own. Having 20 other major financial institutions involved could create a broader network and make the stablecoin more useful to institutional customers.

The biggest risk is weak adoption. Stablecoins have gained significant traction in crypto markets, but bank-issued alternatives have yet to demonstrate comparable demand. Reuters reported that Societe Generale’s dollar-backed stablecoin had only around $12.5 million in circulation, compared with more than $180 billion for Tether.

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE:GS) could therefore end up investing in infrastructure that produces limited revenue. There is also significant competition from established stablecoin issuers and other financial institutions developing their own digital-payment solutions. Regulatory uncertainty adds another layer of risk. As a result, the project is unlikely to have a material impact on Goldman’s earnings in the near term.

Bank of America- Bull & Bear Case

Bank of America Corporation (NYSE:BAC) could have a particularly strong use case for a bank-backed stablecoin because of its large payments and commercial-banking operations. If companies increasingly use stablecoins to move money, especially across borders, BofA could integrate the technology into its existing relationships with corporate and institutional clients.

The initiative could also help BofA protect its position in payments as financial transactions become more digital. By participating from the beginning, the bank can help shape the infrastructure rather than risk having fintech or crypto companies capture the opportunity. Expansion into other G7 currencies could further increase the potential usefulness of the network for multinational businesses.

The same stablecoin technology could eventually create challenges for Bank of America Corporation (NYSE:BAC)’s traditional deposit business. If customers shift significant amounts of money from conventional bank deposits into stablecoins, banks could face pressure on their funding base and potentially higher costs to retain deposits.

More immediately, BofA faces the same adoption problem as Goldman. There is no guarantee that customers will switch to a bank-issued stablecoin simply because major banks are behind it. If usage remains limited, the investment could generate little incremental revenue while requiring substantial spending on technology, compliance, and infrastructure.

Conclusion

Goldman Sachs and Bank of America are positioning themselves for a potential shift toward blockchain-based payments, making the stablecoin initiative strategically positive but financially unproven. Goldman could benefit from new opportunities across institutional finance and digital assets, while BofA could leverage its extensive payments and corporate-banking relationships.

Still, investors should not view the planned 2027 launch as a major near-term earnings catalyst. The critical question is whether businesses and financial institutions actually adopt the stablecoin at scale. If adoption takes off, both banks could gain new sources of payments and financial-services revenue; if demand remains weak, the initiative may offer little more than a strategic hedge against a changing financial system.

While we acknowledge the potential of GS and BAC as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you’re looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock.

READ NEXT: SPGI Yields Around 1%. Is Its Dividend Growth Worth the Low Starting Yield? and Why P&G’s 3% Yield Could Matter More to Long-Term Dividend Investors 

Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.