Clive Parry wrote in the comments on this blog yesterday that:
We need to reverse the line argument “We can only have public services if we have a strong economy” to become “we can only have a strong economy if we have functioning public services”.
I agree. I argued as such in my 2011 book, The Courageous State. In that I explained the importance of the mixed economy, saying that there is a necessary balance between the state and private sectors, each having a very real role to play in the economy. To explain this I suggested that the economy is a bit like a cappuccino.
The state is the cup. The productive economy exists within it for the purposes of this example. (Of course it extends beyond it, but that is for another blog; just think about the coffee shop if you want to anticipate the direction travel, and also imagine the saucer as the social safety net if you want to take the metaphor in another direction).
The espresso that goes into the cup first, and so appears to initially sit on the bottom, is the government and the activity that it undertakes. It is fundamental to the whole thing. It underpins everything else. Without it then the cappuccino is not a coffee. And if it is good then pretty much the whole thing will be, and vice versa. Despite that, it is virtually lost to view in the final product, when it is presented.
The hot milk comes next and is the private sector that builds on the foundation of the state.
On the top is some chocolate or nutmeg, which is the thing we all see, and which we, as a result, think defines the cappuccino. This represents the bits of life that we tend to think most fun, because they’re what we want when all the basics have been dealt with. And because the private sector produces most of these fun things we tend to value what the private sector does most when in fact none of these fun bits would be possible without the state and the mundane, and even rather boring things, that much of the market also does.
The cappuccino helps us understand that. The reality is that in practice a cappuccino stands or falls as a whole. It’s hot frothy milk without the espresso. It is just an espresso without the milk. The chocolate or nutmeg are optional. Now I admit, all are acquired tastes for some: we should not ignore that. But the reality is that many think that the compromise — with the fun bits on top — is best. And most importantly, when drunk you can’t tell the component elements apart. Each integrates to make a whole.
That, I suggest, is also the case with a mixed economy: the parts are interdependent and make a whole and without each other that whole could not exist.
Let’s not push the metaphor too far, but the task we face in our political economy is to find politicians who, like a skilled barista, can blend the right product for our economy that delivers the appropriate mix of the state and private sectors where each recognises the role of the other and is willing to support the role that the other has to play.
I would suggest that we are short of those skills. Far too few politicians appreciate the fundamental role of the state. And we have a private sector, or at least its proponents, who refuse to recognise that they can only exist in a partnership relationship with government. Ideology gets in their way of appreciating that fact.
I might also add that those on the left who think we can do without the private sector are just as guilty of this failure to appreciate the need for that partnership relationship.
My aim has always been for a cappuccino economy: one where state and private sectors both flourish because each is allowed to do what it does best. We’re a long way from being there right now.
In my opinion there are two reasons for that. The first is that the espresso has been too weak for too long. We need definitely need an extra shot of government spending.
And on the other hand, shareholder capitalism has withdrawn all the resilience that companies have needed to survive the type of stress we’re now seeing. It’s as if they thought they could get away with semi-skimmed milk when full fat (which has been skimmed off by speculators) has always been needed to ensure that companies have the strength they need to be good employers, reliable suppliers and players for the long term, able to fulfil their commitments to all in society. That’s just about the opposite of what modern capitalism is giving us.
You’ll note that it’s not one side that needs a boost right now: both do.
When will we get politicians who appreciate that fact, for fact I think it is?
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
There are links to this blog’s glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.
You can subscribe to this blog’s daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here: